A third dose SARS­CoV­2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine results in improved immune response in hemodialysis patients.

Background: The hemodialysis (HD) population has been a vulnerable group during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Advanced chronic kidney disease with uremia is associated with weaker immune response to infections and an attenuated response to vaccines. The aim of this study was to study the humoral and cellular response to the second and third doses of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in HD patients and to follow the response over time. Methods: The patients received their first two vaccine doses from 28 December 2020 within a 4-week interval and the third dose in September 2021 and were followed-up for humoral and cellular immune response at 1) 7-15 weeks and 2) 6-8 months after dose two (no t-cell reactivity measured), and 3) 3 weeks and 4) 3 months after dose three. Fifty patients were initially enrolled, and 40 patients were followed during the entire study. Levels of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody against the Spike antigen (anti-S) and T-cell reactivity testing against the Spike protein using Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISPOT) technology were evaluated. Results: IgG antibodies to anti-S were detected in 35 (88%) of the 40 patients 7-15 weeks after vaccine dose two, 31 (78%) were positive, and 4 (10%) borderline. The median anti-S titer was 606 Abbott Units/milliliter (AU/mL) (interquartile range [IQR] 134-1,712). Three months after the third dose, anti-S was detected in 38 (95%) of 40 patients (P < 0.01 compared to after dose two), and the median anti-S titer was 9,910 AU/mL (IQR 2,325-26,975). Cellular reactivity was detected in 22 (55%), 34 (85%), and 28 (71%) of the 40 patients, and the median T-cell response was 9.5 (IQR 3.5-80), 51.5 (14.8-132), and 19.5 (8.8-54.2) units, respectively, for 6-8 months after dose two, 3 weeks, and 3 months after dose three. Conclusions: Our data show that a third dose of SARS­CoV­2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine gives a robust and improved immunological response in HD patients, but a few patients did not develop any anti-S response during the entire study, indicating the importance to monitor the vaccine response since those who do not respond could now be given monoclonal antibodies if they contract a COVID-19 infection or in the future antivirals.

Three Doses of SARS‑COV‑2 BNT162B2 MRNA Vaccine Results in an Enhanced Immunologic B- And T-Cell Response in Haemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The immune system is affected by uremia. Haemodialysis (HD) patients have an increased risk of acquiring infections due to many healthcare contacts and have a suboptimal response to vaccination and a high mortality from COVID-19 infection. Accumulating data indicate that two doses of vaccines are not enough, and most HD-patients have now received a third dose. The aim of the study was to describe the antibody and T-cell response to three doses of SARS‑CoV‑2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination and change over time. METHOD Initially, 50 patients (mean age 69.4 years and 62% men) with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and haemodialysis treatment, at the dialysis outpatient clinic, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Sweden were enrolled into the study. Administration of SARS‑CoV‑2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine began on 28 Decemeber 2020. In September 2021, the patients received their third vaccine dose. During the study four patients died, four received a kidney transplant and two did not receive the third vaccine dose. A total of 41 (82%) patients received three doses of vaccine and were followed up until 3 months after the third dose. The antibody response was measured at four timepoints;7–15 weeks and 6–8 months after the second dose, 3 weeks and 3 months after the third dose, and the T-cell response at three timepoints;7–15 weeks after the second dose, 3 weeks and 3 months after the third dose. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody test (Abbott Architect) was performed against Spike antigen (anti-S) positive both after COVID-19 infection and vaccination (quantitative method used in routine diagnostics at Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala) and T-cell reactivity testing against the Spike protein using ELISPOT technology measuring interferon-gamma activity was performed at ABC-labs, Solna. RESULTS After two doses, IgG antibodies (IgG abs) to anti-S were detected in 37 (74%) of 50 patients, 5 (10%) had a borderline response and 8 (16%) were negative. T-cell response were detected in 29 (58%) of 50 patients and in 21 (42%) no response was detected. Before the third dose IgG abs to anti-S were detected in 24 (52%) of 46 patients, 3 (7%) had a borderline response and 19 (41%) were negative. Three weeks after the third dose IgG abs to anti-S were detected in 39 (95%) of 41 patients, and 2 (5%) were negative. T-cell responses were detected in 35 (85%) of 41 patients and in 6 (15%) no response. Three months after the third dose IgG ab to anti-S were still detected in 38 (95%) of 40 patients, and 2 (5%) were negative. Changes in IgG ab to anti-S and T-cell response over time in patients who received all three doses of vaccine and were followed up until 3 months after the latest dose (n = 40 and 37) are displayed in Figures 1 and 2 (preliminary data). CONCLUSION These results highlight the need for at least three doses of the SARS‑CoV‑2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. It also indicates that the effect of the vaccine decreases slower after dose 3 than after dose 2 since almost all patients had a measurable immune response 3 months after dose 3. However, not all patients develop an immunological response. In a clinical setting, it is justified to measure the antibody response after vaccination to identify patients that are not protected and where one needs to take other measures to protect them from infection and/or to give early treatment in case of symptoms.FIGURE 1: Changes in IgG antibodies to anti-S in patients who received three doses of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and were followed up until 3 months after the latest dose (n = 40).FIGURE 2: Changes T-cell response patients who received three doses of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and were followed up until 3 months after the latest dose (n = 37).

Humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have an increased risk of acquiring infections due to many health care contacts and may, in addition, have a suboptimal response to vaccination and a high mortality from Covid-19 infection. METHODS: In 50 HD patients (mean age 69.4 years, 62% men) administration of SARS-CoV-2BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine began in Dec 2020 and the immune response was evaluated 7-15 weeks after the last dose. Levels of Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody against the nucleocapsid antigen (anti-N) and the Spike antigen (anti-S) and T-cell reactivity testing against the Spike protein using ELISPOT technology were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients, anti-S IgG antibodies indicating a vaccine effect or previous Covid-19 infection, were detected in 37 (74%), 5 (10%) had a borderline response and 8 (16%) were negative after two doses of vaccine. T-cell responses were detected in 29 (58%). Of the 37 patients with anti-S antibodies, 25 (68%) had a measurable T-cell response. 2 (40%) out of 5 patients with borderline anti-S and 2 (25%) without anti-S had a concomitant T-cell response. Twenty-seven (54%) had both an antibody and T-cell response. IgG antibodies to anti-N indicating a previous Covid-19 disease were detected in 7 (14%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most HD patients develop a B- and/or T-cell response after vaccination against Covid-19 but approx. 20% had a limited immunological response. T-cell reactivity against Covid-19 was only present in a few of the anti-S antibody negative patients.

High expression of neutrophil and monocyte CD64 with simultaneous lack of upregulation of adhesion receptors CD11b, CD162, CD15, CD65 on neutrophils in severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The pronounced neutrophilia observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections suggests a role for these leukocytes in the pathology of the disease. Monocyte and neutrophil expression of CD64 and CD11b have been reported as early biomarkers to detect infections. The aim of this study was to study the expression of receptors for IgG (CD64) and adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD15s, CD65, CD162, CD66b) on neutrophils and monocytes in patients with severe COVID-19 after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The expression of receptors was analyzed using flow cytometry. EDTA blood from 23 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection was sampled within 48 h of admission to the ICU. Leukocytes were labeled with antibodies to CD11b, CD15s, CD65s, CD162, CD64, and CD66b. Expression of receptors was reported as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) or the percentage of cells expressing receptors. RESULTS: Results are presented as comparison of COVID-19 patients with the healthy group and the receptor expression as MFI. Neutrophil receptors CD64 (2.5 versus 0.5) and CD66b (44.5 versus 34) were increased and CD15 decreased (21.6 versus 28.3) when CD65 (6.6 versus 4.4), CD162 (21.3 versus 21.1) and CD11b (10.5 versus 12) were in the same range. Monocytes receptors CD64 (30.5 versus 16.6), CD11b (18.7 versus 9.8), and CD162 (38.6 versus 36.5) were increased and CD15 decreased (10.3 versus 17.9); CD65 were in the same range (2.3 versus 1.96). CONCLUSION: Monocytes and neutrophils are activated during severe COVID-19 infection as shown by strong upregulation of CD64. High monocyte and neutrophil CD64 can be an indicator of a severe form of COVID19. The adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD162, CD65, and CD15) are not upregulated on otherwise activated neutrophils, which might lead to relative impairment of tissue migration. Low adhesion profile of neutrophils suggests immune dysfunction of neutrophils. Monocytes maintain upregulation of some adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD162) suggesting the persistence of an increased ability to migrate into tissues, even during a severe stage of COVID-19. Future research should focus on CD64 and CD11b kinetics in the context of prognosis.

COVIDENZA - A prospective, multicenter, randomized PHASE II clinical trial of enzalutamide treatment to decrease the morbidity in patients with Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The main goal of the COVIDENZA trial is to evaluate if inhibition of testosterone signalling by enzalutamide can improve the outcome of patients hospitalised for COVID-19. The hypothesis is based on the observation that the majority of patients in need of intensive care are male, and the connection between androgen receptor signalling and expression of TMPRSS2, an enzyme important for SARS-CoV-2 host cell internalization. TRIAL DESIGN: Hospitalised COVID-19 patients will be randomised (2:1) to enzalutamide plus standard of care vs. standard of care designed to identify superiority. PARTICIPANTS: Included participants, men or women above 50 years of age, must be hospitalised for PCR confirmed COVID-19 symptoms and not in need of immediate mechanical ventilation. Major exclusion criteria are breast-feeding or pregnant women, hormonal treatment for prostate or breast cancer, treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, current symptomatic unstable cardiovascular disease (see Additional file 1 for further details). The trial is registered at Umeå University Hospital, Region Västerbotten, Sweden and 8 hospitals are approved for inclusion in Sweden. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Patients randomised to the treatment arm will be treated orally with 160 mg (4x40 mg) enzalutamide (Xtandi®) daily, for five consecutive days. The study is not placebo controlled. The comparator is standard of care treatment for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary endpoints of the study are (time to) need of mechanical ventilation or discharge from hospital as assessed by a clinical 7-point ordinal scale (up to 30 days after inclusion). RANDOMISATION: Randomisation was stratified by center and sex. Each strata was randomized separately with block size six with a 2:1 allocation ratio (enzalutamide + "standard of care": "standard of care"). The randomisation list, with consecutive subject numbers, was generated by an independent statistician using the PROC PLAN procedure of SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina) BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label trial. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The trial is designed to have three phases. The first, an exploration phase of 45 participants (30 treatment and 15 control) will focus on safety and includes a more extensive laboratory assessment as well as more frequent safety evaluation. The second prolongation phase, includes the first 100 participants followed by an interim analysis to define the power of the study. The third phase is the continuation of the study up to maximum 600 participants included in total. TRIAL STATUS: The current protocol version is COVIDENZA v2.0 as of September 10, 2020. Recruitment started July 29, 2020 and is presently in safety pause after the first exploration phase. Recruitment is anticipated to be complete by 31 December 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudract number 2020-002027-10 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04475601 , registered June 8, 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.